Can COVID-19 Lead to Differences in COPD Patients' Exacerbations and Clinical Evolution? (preprint)

Background COPD patients show higher mortality and worse prognosis in the acute phase of COVID-19, and survivors may suffer persistent symptoms that could make them more vulnerable to exacerbations.Objectives We aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on the exacerbations, symptoms, quality of life, and mental health of a cohort of COPD patients.Methods Retrospective case-control single-centre study including all COPD patients from the pulmonary consultation of University Hospital Santa Maria (Lleida, Spain) surviving COVID-19 between March 2020 and September 2021, and similar propensity-score-matched (1:2) COPD patients. Differences in COPD exacerbations, COPD clinical evolution (lung function, dyspnoea, CAT and symptoms), long COVID-19 symptoms, quality of life, and mental health, were assessed at the end of 2021.Results We included 39 COVID-19 COPD patients and 78 similar non-COVID-19. No differences were found on exacerbations (46(59%) vs 27(69.2%), p = 0.380), dyspnoea (2 [1; 3] vs 2 [1; 3], p = 0.921) CAT (14.5 [10.0; 18.8] vs 13.0 [10.0; 16.0], p = 0.432). Only the prevalence of smell or taste disorders, hair loss and tingling was higher in COVID-19 patients. No differences were found in quality of life or mental health.Conclusions COPD patients surviving COVID-19 were not at a higher risk of COPD exacerbations nor showed significant changes in COPD clinical evolution, and only showed differences in a few very specific COVID-19 symptoms. These unexpected results suggest that the conditions triggered by the pandemic and its management could have affected COPD patients as much as actually having had COVID-19.

Antigenemia Is Associated to Viral Sepsis and Mortality in COVID-19 (preprint)

Background: Severe COVID-19 has been proposed to represent a form of viral sepsis. The prevalence of sepsis due to this disease has not been evaluated. Some patients with severe COVID-19 present SARS-CoV-2 antigenemia. Whether antigenemia constitutes a factor associated to viral sepsis and fatal outcome in these patients is unknown. Methods: This study recruited 400 patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Prevalence of sepsis in the first 24 hours following hospitalization was determined using the SEPSIS-3 criteria. Prevalence and concentration of SARS-CoV-2 N-antigenemia was determined in plasma at hospitalization using the Panbio® COVID-19 Ag Rapid Test from Abbott and the COV-QUANTO® ELISA from AAZ. Findings: The prevalence of sepsis due to SARS-CoV-2 infection at hospitalization was of 54%, affecting mostly to the respiratory, renal and coagulation function. Antigenemia was present in the 53% of the patients, and constituted an independent risk factor of sepsis in the multivariate analysis (OR [CI95%], p): presence of N-antigenemia (Panbio®): (1·6 [1·1 - 2·5],0·023); concentration of N-antigen >575 pg/mL (COV-QUANTO®): (1·9 [1·0 - 3·5], 0·043). Antigenemia was associated with a reduction in the survival mean time of 9·42 and 9·33 days in the 90 first days following hospitalization, based on the PANBIO® and the COV-QUANTO® tests respectively. Interpretation: Half of the COVID-19 patients needing of hospitalization fulfill the criteria of sepsis. Antigenemia is strongly linked to the presence of this condition, and confers a higher risk of mortality. Monitoring the presence of antigenemia at the earlier moments of COVID-19 could help to identify those patients at risk of deterioration. Clinical Trial Registration Details: This was a sub-study of the CIBERES-UCI-COVID project, registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with the identification NCT04457505. Funding Information: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (COV20/00110; CP20/00041; FI20/00278), Fundació La Marató de TV3 (473/C/2021).Declaration of Interests: AT, JME, FB, RA and JFBM have a patent application on SARS-CoV-2 antigenemia. The remainder authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this work.Ethics Approval Statement: Written or oral informed consent was obtained directly from all patients, or their legal representative, before enrolment. Scientific and ethical approval of the study protocol was obtained from the respective scientific committees for clinical research of the participant hospitals.

Decrease in sleep quality during COVID-19 outbreak (preprint)

Purpose: The COVID-19 outbreak witnessed in the first months of 2020 has led to unprecedented changes in society’s lifestyle. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effect of this unexpected context on sleep.Methods: During the COVID-19 outbreak, we performed an online survey with individuals formerly recruited for validation of the Spanish version of the sleep questionnaire Satisfaction, Alertness, Timing, Efficiency, and Duration (SATED). In the current survey, we asked the participants to complete the previously answered questionnaires, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), a modified version of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and the SATED questionnaire. We also assessed mood using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire.Results: The 71 participants were mostly women (75%), with a mean (±SD) age of 40.7 ± 11.9 years. Comparing the previous PSQI score to that during the COVID-19 outbreak, we observed worsening sleep quality (5.45 ± 3.14 to 6.18 ± 3.03 points, p = 0.035). In parallel, there was an increase in the negative mood (p = 0.002). Accordingly, the decrease in sleep quality was substantially correlated with negative mood (p < 0.001). There were no differences in the ESS or SATED.Conclusions: The COVID-19 outbreak-associated events correlate with decreased sleep quality in association with an increase in negative mood. Considering the importance of sleep for a healthy life, and in particular for immune function, efforts should be made to improve awareness of this matter and to offer psychological assistance to affected individuals.